Re: 12 hour table vacuums

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:00:05 -0700
Ron St-Pierre <ron.pgsql@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> Okay, here's our system:
> >>   postgres 8.1.4
> >>     
> >
> > Upgrade to 8.1.10
> >   
> Any particular fixes in 8.1.10 that would help with this?
> >   
> >> Here's the table information:
> >> The table has 140,000 rows, 130 columns (mostly NUMERIC), 60
> >> indexes. 
> >
> > 60 indexes?  You gotta be kidding.  You really have 60 columns on
> > which to scan?
> >
> >   
> Really. 60 indexes. They're the most commonly requested columns for 
> company information (we believe). Any ideas on testing our
> assumptions about that? I would like to know definitively what are
> the most popular columns. Do you think that rules would be a good
> approach for this? (Sorry if I'm getting way off topic here)

I suggest you:

1. Turn on stats and start looking in the stats columns to see what
indexes are actually being used.

2. Strongly review your normalization :)

Joshua D. Drake



-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux