>>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 8:37 AM, in message <21403.1190036229@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
>> <1190015368.148293.56830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, valgog
>> <valgog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:=20
>>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>>>
>>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>>> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?
>
>> Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set.
>
> Really? In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of
> an enum-style field?
My bad. I did misread it. Sorry, all.
-Kevin
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
