"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 2:49 AM, in message
> <1190015368.148293.56830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, valgog
> <valgog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:=20
>> Are you sure you understood what was the question?
>>
>> Is the TBL1.CATEGORY = TBL2.CATEGORY the same as TBL1.CATEGORY &
>> TBL2.CATEGORY > 0?
> Yes, given that he stipulated that one and only one bit would be set.
Really? In that case, isn't this bit-field just a bad implementation of
an enum-style field?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
