On 9/5/07, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/5/07, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec.register@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc > > > array. > > > > Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk > > subsystem because the client is using NTFS (i.e. Windows) > > No, I think he's referring more to the lack of reliability of NTFS > compared to UFS / ZFS / JFS / XFS on unixen. Lack of reliability compared to _UFS_? Can you elaborate on this? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
