"Simon Riggs" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Reformatting and sorting, we have >> >> WARNING: page 28900 of relation 1663/16384/76718 was uninitialized >> WARNING: page 28902 of relation 1663/16384/76718 was uninitialized >> WARNING: page 26706 of relation 1663/16384/76719 was uninitialized >> WARNING: page 26708 of relation 1663/16384/76719 was uninitialized > Those two are interesting because we appear to have two valid pages in > the middle of some uninitialized ones. That implies were not looking at > an unapplied truncation. Not necessarily --- it's possible the WAL sequence simply didn't touch those pages. Your suggestion to rerun the recovery with higher log_min_messages is a good one, because that way we'd get some detail about what the WAL records that touched the pages were. I think DEBUG1 would be sufficient for that, though, and DEBUG2 might be pretty durn verbose. regards, tom lane
