Re: Parallel Vacuum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:13:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <200703231637.33211.dimitrik.fr@xxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200703221435.54408.dimitrik.fr@xxxxxxxxx> <200703221924.39278.dimitrik.fr@xxxxxxxxx> <20070322184613.GJ11402@xxxxxxxxx> <200703231637.33211.dimitrik.fr@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 04:37:32PM +0100, Dimitri wrote:

Speed-up x4 is obtained just because single vacuum process reaching max80MB/sec in throughput


I'd look at trying to improve that, it seems very low.

Mike Stone

References:
- Parallel Vacuum
  - From: Dimitri
- Re: Parallel Vacuum
  - From: Dimitri
- Re: Parallel Vacuum
  - From: Michael Stone
- Re: Parallel Vacuum
  - From: Dimitri

Prev by Date: Re: Performance of count(*)
Next by Date: EXISTS optimization
Previous by thread: Re: Parallel Vacuum
Next by thread: Sunfire X4500 recommendations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux