"Craig A. James" <cjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> You mean >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-10/msg00283.php >> ? I don't see anything there that bears on Steve's suggestion. > Mea culpa, it's October 8, not October 18: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2006-10/msg00143.php I still don't see the relevance to Steve's suggestion. regards, tom lane
