Re: Simple join optimized badly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:41:42 -0400
Cc: pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Kirkwood <markir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Craig A. James" <cjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Comments: In-reply-to Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> message dated "Mon, 09 Oct 2006 10:12:43 -0700"
In-reply-to: <200610091012.43855.josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <45274A77.7080005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4529C43A.3050503@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19817.1160369035@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200610091012.43855.josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Josh Berkus <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Unfortunately, EDB's solution is likely to be Oracle-based, which is
> liable to fall into the trap of "not good enough."

I'd be a bit worried about Oracle patents as well...

			regards, tom lane

References:
- Simple join optimized badly?
  - From: Craig A. James
- Re: Simple join optimized badly?
  - From: Mark Kirkwood
- Re: Simple join optimized badly?
  - From: Tom Lane
- Re: Simple join optimized badly?
  - From: Josh Berkus

Prev by Date: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Next by Date: odd variances in count(*) times
Previous by thread: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Next by thread: Re: Simple join optimized badly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Postgresql General] [Postgresql PHP] [PHP Users] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux