On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 01:09:04PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3, > > For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for > xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which > doesn't need metadata journalling. Are 'we' sure that such a setup can't lose any data? I'm worried about files getting lost when they get written out before the metadata does. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
