Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and

[Michael Stone <mstone+postgres@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 12:05:46PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Wow, interesting. IIRC, XFS is lower performing than ext3,

For xlog, maybe. For data, no. Both are definately slower than ext2 for 
xlog, which is another reason to have xlog on a small filesystem which 
doesn't need metadata journalling.

Mike Stone