Gavin Hamill <gdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:31:48 -0400 > Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There should be a fix for this by the time PG 8.2 comes out, but in >> the meantime you might find that it helps to write the range check in >> a way that doesn't have identical bounds, eg >> date >= '2006-06-10'::date AND date < '2006-06-11'::date > OK coolies - we've already had a code release for this (and other > stuff) planned for tomorrow morning checking on the client side > if a single date has been chosen, then do an equality test on that... Fair enough, no reason to replace one workaround with another. But would you try it on your test case, just to verify the diagnosis? regards, tom lane
