See also http://www.jonathangardner.net/PostgreSQL/materialized_views/matviews.html On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 02:25:08AM +0000, Casey Allen Shobe wrote: > I typed up a description of a situation where the only viable option to > improve performance was to use a materialized view, which, when implemented, > was found to improve performance twenty-sevenfold, even with a fairly small > amount of excess data (which is antipated to grow). I thought this might be > of use to anybody else in a similar situation, so I thought I'd post it here. > > http://community.seattleserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=11 > > Feel free to reproduce as you see fit. > > Cheers, > -- > Casey Allen Shobe | cshobe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 206-381-2800 > SeattleServer.com, Inc. | http://www.seattleserver.com > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
