On 6 Dec 2005, at 16:47, Joshua Kramer wrote:
Has anyone ever compared TSearch2 to Lucene, as far as performance is concerned?
In our experience (small often-updated documents) Lucene leaves tsearch2 in the dust. This probably has a lot to do with our usage pattern though. For our usage it's very beneficial to have the index on a separate machine to the data, however in many cases this won't make sense. Lucene is also a lot easier to "cluster" than Postgres (it's simply a matter of NFS-mounting the index).
Russ Garrett russ@xxxxxxx
