On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 7:21 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2024-May-09, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> With RECREATE TABLE, one day, we would be probably have RECREATE TABLE
> CONCURRENTLY implemented, making pg_repack less needed.
If we really wanted to rename VACUUM FULL, I would go for a name that
betrays its CLUSTER implementation -- maybe CLUSTER UNSORTED or so --
I considered that, for the same reason. But there's no such thing as an unsorted CLUSTER, since the whole purpose of CLUSTER is to sort the data.
