On 2024-May-09, Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: > With RECREATE TABLE, one day, we would be probably have RECREATE TABLE > CONCURRENTLY implemented, making pg_repack less needed. If we really wanted to rename VACUUM FULL, I would go for a name that betrays its CLUSTER implementation -- maybe CLUSTER UNSORTED or so -- and document it together with regular CLUSTER. We don't really need a new top-level command for it IMO. As for pg_repack, I'd much rather get VACUUM SQUEEZE using pg_squeeze as an implementation starting point (without the scheduling stuff though.) -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
