Re: application_name backend (not) reporting back to the client : pgbouncer, PgSQL 16.1, pgbouncer 1.21.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Achilleas Mantzios <a.mantzios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hi again, I am puzzled with your observations, this is what I get with 
> psql straight against PostgreSQL no pgbouncer involved :

> command :
> psql "postgresql://amantzio@localhost:5432/dynacom?application_name="

> ...
> public.S....is_superuser.on.S....application_name..S...&default_transaction_read_only.off.S....scram_iterations.4096.S....DateStyle.ISO, 
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I see the report of application_name with an empty-string value right
there.

> the client does not send the application_name

I do not know what you mean by that, but maybe your client code has
some special-case behavior for an empty string?

			regards, tom lane






[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Home]     [Postgresql General]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Postgresql PHP]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Databases]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux