Thanks much Rui and All for the valuable inputs. Rui's suggested solution would be sufficient for our audit requirement.
Thank you,
Vipin
On Sat, May 8, 2021, 7:59 PM Rui DeSousa <rui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On May 8, 2021, at 8:55 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The problem with this scheme is that any role with SUPERUSER privs can modify that table.
>
True; and if that is a concern then audit the table from a different system where those superusers do not have access to.
