Re: wal-g (https://github.com/wal-g/wal-g) reliability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrey Borodin wrote:
> 
> 
> > 9 февр. 2021 г., в 15:12, Victor Sudakov <vas@xxxxxxxxxx> написал(а):
> > 
> > I'm considering WAL-G now, not as a backup solution per se, but as an
> > advanced WAL archiver which can:
> Keep in mind that once upon a time you will have to delete WAL segments. If you just use wal-g delete you have to point our which backup to keep.

Thank you, this is an important note.

> 
> > 1. Upload/download WALs directly to S3
> > 
> > 2. Verify WALs integrity (a very nice feature, but I think does not work
> > if there are no backups)
> If will not be alarmed if WALs before backup are missing. Though it should still analyze chains correctly.
> 
> > 3. Prevent WAL overwrite (does it work?)
> I think so.
> 

OK.

-- 
Victor Sudakov,  VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux