> 9 февр. 2021 г., в 15:12, Victor Sudakov <vas@xxxxxxxxxx> написал(а): > > I'm considering WAL-G now, not as a backup solution per se, but as an > advanced WAL archiver which can: Keep in mind that once upon a time you will have to delete WAL segments. If you just use wal-g delete you have to point our which backup to keep. > 1. Upload/download WALs directly to S3 > > 2. Verify WALs integrity (a very nice feature, but I think does not work > if there are no backups) If will not be alarmed if WALs before backup are missing. Though it should still analyze chains correctly. > 3. Prevent WAL overwrite (does it work?) I think so. Thanks! Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
