|
Hello David Yes, I did read the thread. However, I still don’t see the advantage of running: REINDEX ( VERBOSE ) DATABASE xxx; Instead of: REINDEX VERBOSE DATABASE xxx; And coming back to the TAB completion thing, which is a fantastic feature, by the way, does not show you the option which comes in parentheses. I don’t know if this is by design or not. >REINDEX [TAB] [TAB] DATABASE INDEX SCHEMA SYSTEM TABLE I would expect with the current syntax implementation: >REINDEX [TAB] [TAB] (VERBOSE) DATABASE INDEX SCHEMA SYSTEM TABLE Nevertheless, thanks everyone. I think I will switch to the command line tool reindexdb. ;-) This one is more intuitive from my point of view:
reindexdb --verbose --dbname=xxx Cheers,
William Von: David G. Johnston [mailto:david.g.johnston@xxxxxxxxx]
On Wednesday, July 3, 2019, William Sescu (Suva) <william.sescu@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Its possible but such a patch would never be committed (did you read the email thread?). Intuitiveness isn’t a huge concern here. Especially for a command that isn’t intended to be run manually often. The learning curve for PostgreSQL includes knowing where to find command syntax and how to read it. Its a complex language that is constantly being added to. David J. Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht und ihr eventuell angehängte Dateien sind nur für den Adressaten bestimmt. Sie kann vertrauliche oder gesetzlich geschützte Daten oder Informationen beinhalten. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlich erreicht hat, bitten wir Sie höflich, diese unter Ausschluss jeglicher Reproduktion zu löschen und die absendende Person zu benachrichtigen. Danke für Ihre Hilfe. This message and any attached files are for the sole use of the recipient named above. It may contain confidential or legally protected data or information. If you have received this message in error, please delete it without making any copies whatsoever and notify the sender. Thank you for your assistance. |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
