Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
From: legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:04:40 -0700 (MST)
In-reply-to: <CACut7uTMN=E-OK+gdvUU3BMn+O+OAbA9nd3R=W9wLfnvv2TaHg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACut7uTMN=E-OK+gdvUU3BMn+O+OAbA9nd3R=W9wLfnvv2TaHg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi
something similar is already discussed here:

https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-11-global-index-td6032681.html

Regards
PAscal



--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
  - From: Jorge Torralba

References:
- Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
  - From: Jorge Torralba

Prev by Date: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
Next by Date: Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
Previous by thread: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
Next by thread: Re: Is there a work around for partition key needed for constraint
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux