Re: Never kill -9 postgres client processes on Linux... but why not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 04/18/2018 11:53 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Hi,


On 19/04/18 16:40, Wells Oliver wrote:
Had an issue tonight where I had a bunch of stalled queries from a client connection and I just... could... not... kill... them. We disconnected the client machine, turned it off, picked it up, shook it around, yelled at it, and still these idle queries remained in pg_stat_activity.

Then I did select pg_cancel_backend(pid) from pg_stat_activity where client_addr = '..' and they just would... not... go.. away.

So me being the big smart system administrator guy with shell access, I logged in, and did a kill -9 xxx where xxx was the sme pid from the pg_stat_activity result and... they finally went away!

Felt good about myself until I realized, well, so did every other connection, and in fact PG momentarily went into recovery mode.

Everything was fine, but a) why is it a bad idea to kill -9 a client PG process, but pg_cancel_backend() is OK-- and b) what to do about stalled PG queries that won't die when you disconnect AND when you pg_cancel_backend() them?


Did you try pg_terminate_backend? I'm guessing that might not have worked either...but is worth it trying before belting them with kill -9!

+1 to pg_terminate_backend.  On the rare occasion pg_cancel_backend doesn't work, I hit the pid with pg_terminate_backend, and that always works.

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux