Re: Never kill -9 postgres client processes on Linux... but why not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On 19/04/18 16:40, Wells Oliver wrote:
Had an issue tonight where I had a bunch of stalled queries from a client connection and I just... could... not... kill... them. We disconnected the client machine, turned it off, picked it up, shook it around, yelled at it, and still these idle queries remained in pg_stat_activity.

Then I did select pg_cancel_backend(pid) from pg_stat_activity where client_addr = '..' and they just would... not... go.. away.

So me being the big smart system administrator guy with shell access, I logged in, and did a kill -9 xxx where xxx was the sme pid from the pg_stat_activity result and... they finally went away!

Felt good about myself until I realized, well, so did every other connection, and in fact PG momentarily went into recovery mode.

Everything was fine, but a) why is it a bad idea to kill -9 a client PG process, but pg_cancel_backend() is OK-- and b) what to do about stalled PG queries that won't die when you disconnect AND when you pg_cancel_backend() them?


Did you try pg_terminate_backend? I'm guessing that might not have worked either...but is worth it trying before belting them with kill -9!

Kill -9 leaves the shared memory the backend was using intact but possibly corrupted (partial writes etc), so Postgres shuts down everything! This is pretty 'normal' in the db world (I think DB2 does the same if you kill -9 a connection from the OS).

regards
Mark




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux