Re: Pg-Upgrade standbys via rsync... and avoid sending UNlogged data?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Bruce Momjian (bruce@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:34:45PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote:
> > Stephen Frost <sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > 
> > > * Stephen Frost (sfrost@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > >
> > >> > I have among others, a 5TB system  w/about 40G of unlogged data.
> > >> 
> > >> Honestly, sending an extra 40G out of 5TB (we're talking less than 1%
> > >> here...) might be worth it to keep the process simple.
> > >
> > > Of course, I realize right after sending this that you aren't sending
> > > the 5TB. :)
> > 
> > Roger that!  Really, the hard link pg-upgrade option and rsync method
> > for standbys is pure beauty :-)
> > 
> > We have only the post-analyze and this unlogged data  problem to deal
> > with. 
> > 
> > The warehouse is our only system with any substantial amount of unlogged
> > data.
> > 
> > Reducing post-analyze delay was solved by me here with our groovy
> > threaded AnalyzMaTron.  I can get a >5TB system done in about 45 minutes
> > w/20 threads.
> 
> The only thing I can suggest is to document this limitation, if people
> think it is worth it.

It'd probably be good to document what happens with unlogged tables.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux