Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Actually, I realized after looking at it that the new wi_tableshared >> field is unnecessary in my patch. The only important part is that >> knowledge of relisshared be available when we're looking for conflicting >> workers, and that is entirely local in do_autovacuum(). I'd started the >> patch by adding wi_tableshared, on the expectation that it would be >> necessary, but it ain't ... > OK, if I understand you correctly then that is what my patch does -- the > "sharedrel" flag in my patch is only inside do_autovacuum. Do you > already have a test rig for this? I didn't attempt to replicate the problem report, if that's what you mean; I just tested it as far as running the regression tests. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
