Hi Greg, Greg Spiegelberg wrote: > We were bit a couple months ago by a very similar issue where autovacuum > ignored pg_type. A manual vacuum fixed it but since that table is abused > by every client using libpq which is darn near everything I suspect it went > bad in a hurry. Hmm. The current report is about shared catalogs (pg_shdepend and pg_database were reported as problematic) which pg_type is not, so I doubt that this bugfix will have any impact in a problem vacuuming pg_type. I'm interested in seeing a more detailed report from you about the pg_type vacuuming failure. > Question is, will this patch be backported to 9.3? Yes, in my opinion we would backpatch it, back to 9.1 even. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
