Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxx> writes:
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Note however that the issue could only arise on tables that exceed 1GB

> I assume this is true also for other relkinds?  I have >1G indexes here, but tables are <1G.  TIA.

Right, such indexes would be at risk.  However, if it's only the indexes
that exceed 1G, you could consider reindexing those indexes as an
alternative to a full resync.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux