Re: 9.0.15 WAL mis-replay status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Apr 28, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Ray Stell <stellr@xxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> Fix possible mis-replay of WAL records when some segments of a relation aren't full size (Greg Stark, Tom Lane)
> ..
> Note however that the issue could only arise on tables that exceed 1GB

I assume this is true also for other relkinds?  I have >1G indexes here, but tables are <1G.  TIA.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux