Re: Very long "<IDLE> in transaction" query

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:57:08AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "ktm@xxxxxxxx" <ktm@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  
> > You may also want to consider setting a statement_timeout to
> > prevent this until you can find the problem with the application.
>  
> How would a statement timeout help close a transaction on an idle
> connection?  It's idle because no statements are being run.
>  
> -Kevin

Yes, you are correct. I misunderstood. Too bad we do not have a
transaction_timeout.

Regards,
Ken

-- 
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux