Guillaume, Thanks for the pointer. Is it just me that finds it the behavior of pg_restore odd? If the default installation since 9.0 has PL/PgSQL installed then why does pg_restore still emit statements to create the language? As a developer by trade it smells like a bug. -- Brian Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2012, at 10:31, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 22:12 -0500, Brian Weaver wrote: >> So when did the installation of PL/PgSQL into all databases become standard >> operating procedure? It wasn't standard (or at least it didn't choke) on >> the installation of versions 8.3 and 8.4 that I have used on CentOS 5. >> >> Seems like a fairly substantial change. Did I miss it in the release notes? >> > > Since 9.0, it's the third item in the overview list of the release notes > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0.html. > > > -- > Guillaume > http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info > http://www.dalibo.com > -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
