On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Anj Adu <fotographs@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Greg > > We do not archive the WALs. We use application-level replication to > achieve redundancy. WAL archiving was difficult to support with the > earlier hardware we had ( 6x300G 10K disks Dell 2850) given the > volumes we were dealing with. The RAID card should be from the same > manufacturer (LSI in Dell's case). I don't think Greg was talking of WAL archiving, but more of where are the WAL files and how much IO throughput the WAL needs compared to the regular old /data/base store. -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
