On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Gerd König <koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Perhaps we should have a look at> * pg_pool(II) I can only speak of pgpool-II. It's working fine for me in a setupwhich is exactly the same one you have (change OpenSuse for Debian,but the rest is the same). The thing is that pgpool-II itself canbecome a single point of failure unless you provide HA for it (I amdoing so with Heartbeat), but IMHO that would then be a failoversolution, not a multimaster (from pgpool-II's point of view, not thedatabases behind pgpool-II). Next thing I want to do is try Slony-I with pgpool-II, but I thinkthat is not a multimaster solution either. Of course we may have different points of view on what multimaster mean :) If you plan on using pgpool-II, take into consideration thatreplication is done at a SQL query level, which is cool, but has itslimitations. If you use Slony-I inside pgpool-II I think you can takeover those limitations, but the solution is not so... neat, so tospeak :) /discuss -- Jaume Sabaterhttp://linuxsilo.net/ "Ubi sapientas ibi libertas" -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
