Hi, No - not conclusive reason to think it won't work - just would like verification (if it exists) that it does work. Note - though the targets are different, the file is being opened/read by 2 different uncompress -c s... Thanks Susan >From darcy@xxxxxxxxx Fri Feb 22 14:18:10 2008 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on borise.harvard.edu X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Level: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:18:03 -0500 From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@xxxxxxxxx> To: Susan Russo <russo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [PERFORM] CORRECTION to msg 'loading same instance of dump to two different servers simultaneously' Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit No need to crosspost. I removed -performance from the Cc. On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 13:37:43 -0500 (EST) Susan Russo <russo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone has had success doing a simultaneous > load of one Pg dump to two different servers? The load command > is actually run from two different workstations, but reading the > same pgdump-file. Do you have any reason to doubt that this would work? Have you tried it? As long as the targets are different I don't see any problem. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@xxxxxxxxx> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
