Re: Question on partitioning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Simon, you're right on the money.. the guys on the IRC chatroom suggested
that I cast the partitioning column as SMALLINT as the optimizer assumed
Integer and it worked.  Thx for getting back to me
Mark Steben
AutoRevenue

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Riggs [mailto:simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:39 PM
To: Mark Steben
Cc: pgsql-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Question on partitioning

On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:13 -0500, Mark Steben wrote:

> Regarding partitioning - I set up a testing table - parent table and 4
> partitioning children's tables inheriting the
> 
> Attributes of the parent.  I inserted 1800 rows in all - 450 equitably
> in each partition. The CHECK constraints work great.
> 
>   The PART_ID column, defined as SMALLINT, Is the partitioning
> column.  
> 

You'll probably want to look at the caveats here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/ddl-partitioning.html#DDL-PARTITIO
NING-CAVEATS

especially the ones about cross-datatype comparisons in CHECK
constraints.

-- 
  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux