On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:17:46AM -0800, Tomeh, Husam wrote: > > I don't have any numbers; and it may be an misconception as you pointed > out that's out there among Oracle DBAs that need to be re-visited again. > > Tom, could you also explain what you meant in a previous post I found > during my research on this issue, which I may have misunderstood it: "I > actually wish that Postgres would preallocate a lot of blocks in advance > (ie. 100 x 8KB). That would probably improve performance, as it would > not have to keep re-extending the file." > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2001-01/msg00153.php Wrong Tom. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
