On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 11:17, Tomeh, Husam wrote: > I don't have any numbers; and it may be an misconception as you pointed > out that's out there among Oracle DBAs that need to be re-visited again. > > Tom, could you also explain what you meant in a previous post I found > during my research on this issue, which I may have misunderstood it: "I > actually wish that Postgres would preallocate a lot of blocks in advance > (ie. 100 x 8KB). That would probably improve performance, as it would > not have to keep re-extending the file." > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2001-01/msg00153.php > > Thanks, Ummm, that was a different Tom, wasn't it? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
