On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > If it's a matter of whether VACUUM removes rows or not, that's expected: > open-transaction bookkeeping is done across the whole cluster. (This is > not something simple to change, since we may have to consider > transaction IDs in shared catalogs.) I wonder if this restriction could be lifted if we tracked last-vacuum- Xid per relation? -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]alvh.no-ip.org>) "Cuando mañana llegue pelearemos segun lo que mañana exija" (Mowgli)
