Re: PGSQL 7.4.8 : idle in transaction problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FM <dist-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> What is strange is that users on all DB (not only DB1) are affected by 
> the JBOSS <idle in transaction>.
> I understand that it locked DB1 but why it also locked users on others DB ?

You should define "locked" more carefully: exactly what behavior are you
seeing that you don't like?

If it's a matter of whether VACUUM removes rows or not, that's expected:
open-transaction bookkeeping is done across the whole cluster.  (This is
not something simple to change, since we may have to consider
transaction IDs in shared catalogs.)

			regards, tom lane


[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux