On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:15:22PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > On 2024/01/24 1:51, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 11:58:24PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote: > >> The use \columnwidth results in too large figures in -1c and -eb > >> builds. Instead, use \twocolumwidth (\columnwidth of 2c build) and > >> make them more or less similarly scaled. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Queued, thank you! And at some point, I should learn that \twocolumnwidth > > is *not* the width of both columns. ;-) > > That would be \twocolumntextwidth. > > Yes, those namings (by me) are confusing. > > How about calling \twocolumnwidth as \columnwidthofTwoCol, > \onecolumntextwidth as \textwidthofOneCol, and > \twocolumntextwidth as \textwidthofTwoCol ? > > I'd love to use "1c" and "2c" in these names, but numbers are > not allowed in command names of LaTeX. I cannot think of a short name that would not be confusing. :-( So it is probably best for me to get myself used to the current name. Thanx, Paul
