The performace data is generated by a 224-core machine.
Update the number.
Signed-off-by: Alan Huang <mmpgouride@xxxxxxxxx>
---
datastruct/datastruct.tex | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/datastruct/datastruct.tex b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
index 2768a4d3..82affce0 100644
--- a/datastruct/datastruct.tex
+++ b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ non-ideal performance of RCU and hazard pointers to be more readily
discerned.
Both show a change in slope at 224~CPUs, and this is due to hardware
multithreading.
-At 32 and fewer CPUs, each thread has a core to itself.
+At 224 and fewer CPUs, each thread has a core to itself.
In this regime, RCU does better than does hazard pointers because the
latter's read-side \IXpl{memory barrier} result in dead time within the core.
In short, RCU is better able to utilize a core from a single hardware
--
2.34.1
