On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 16:38:12 -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> Hi Akira,
>
> On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:20:48 +0900 Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:02:25 -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
>>> From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Some sentences in refcnt.tex is using only quote for some code words.
>>> Use \tco{} instead, as it is intended to be used for the case.
>>
>> \tco{} doesn't put quotes around it.
>> Didn't you mean \qco{} ?
>
> You're correct, I was out of my mind. I also mistakenly used an email account
> that different from what I signed patches off. I will send a new spin
> tomorrow.
Looks like Paul has already pulled and pushed this (commit 0e96cb8283ca).
Can you send a fix on top ?
Thanks, Akira
>
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
>>
>> Thanks, Akira
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> together/refcnt.tex | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/together/refcnt.tex b/together/refcnt.tex
>>> index 56caed67..4abe1c60 100644
>>> --- a/together/refcnt.tex
>>> +++ b/together/refcnt.tex
>>> @@ -467,15 +467,15 @@ as shown below.
>>>
>>> \QuickQuiz{
>>> Why can't the check for a zero reference count be
>>> - made in a simple ``if'' statement with an atomic
>>> - increment in its ``then'' clause?
>>> + made in a simple \tco{if} statement with an atomic
>>> + increment in its \tco{then} clause?
>>> }\QuickQuizAnswer{
>>> - Suppose that the ``if'' condition completed, finding
>>> + Suppose that the \tco{if} condition completed, finding
>>> the reference counter value equal to one.
>>> Suppose that a release operation executes, decrementing
>>> the reference counter to zero and therefore starting
>>> cleanup operations.
>>> - But now the ``then'' clause can increment the counter
>>> + But now the \tco{then} clause can increment the counter
>>> back to a value of one, allowing the object to be
>>> used after it has been cleaned up.
>>>
