Hi Akira,
On Sun, 30 Apr 2023 07:20:48 +0900 Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:02:25 -0700, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Some sentences in refcnt.tex is using only quote for some code words.
> > Use \tco{} instead, as it is intended to be used for the case.
>
> \tco{} doesn't put quotes around it.
> Didn't you mean \qco{} ?
You're correct, I was out of my mind. I also mistakenly used an email account
that different from what I signed patches off. I will send a new spin
tomorrow.
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > together/refcnt.tex | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/together/refcnt.tex b/together/refcnt.tex
> > index 56caed67..4abe1c60 100644
> > --- a/together/refcnt.tex
> > +++ b/together/refcnt.tex
> > @@ -467,15 +467,15 @@ as shown below.
> >
> > \QuickQuiz{
> > Why can't the check for a zero reference count be
> > - made in a simple ``if'' statement with an atomic
> > - increment in its ``then'' clause?
> > + made in a simple \tco{if} statement with an atomic
> > + increment in its \tco{then} clause?
> > }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> > - Suppose that the ``if'' condition completed, finding
> > + Suppose that the \tco{if} condition completed, finding
> > the reference counter value equal to one.
> > Suppose that a release operation executes, decrementing
> > the reference counter to zero and therefore starting
> > cleanup operations.
> > - But now the ``then'' clause can increment the counter
> > + But now the \tco{then} clause can increment the counter
> > back to a value of one, allowing the object to be
> > used after it has been cleaned up.
> >
