Re: [PATCH -perfbook 0/4] Address potential widowing of headings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:30 AM Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:58:58 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 07:20:20AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> [...]
> >> So the diff below looks somewhat out of context, because the Quiz
> >> part of QQ A.2 is "How could there be such a large gap between
> >> successive consumer reads?".
> >>
> >> ----
> >> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ seq    & \multicolumn{1}{c}{time (seconds)} & delta~  &  a &  b &  c \\
> >>         consumer reads?
> >>         See \path{timelocked.c} for full code.
> >>  }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> >> -       Here are possible scenarios:
> >> +       Here are a few of the errors:
> >>
> >>         \begin{enumerate}
> >>         \item   The consumer might be preempted for long time periods.
> >> ----
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >
> > I changed this to "Here are a few reasons for such gaps:".  Does
> > that work for you?
>
> Works for me!

Works for me too ;-)
>
>         Thanks, Akira
>
> >
> >                                               Thanx, Paul
> >
> >>         Thanks, Akira
> [...]
Thanks, Zhouyi



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux