Re: [PATCH -perfbook 0/4] Address potential widowing of headings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 8 Dec 2021 15:58:58 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 07:20:20AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
[...]
>> So the diff below looks somewhat out of context, because the Quiz
>> part of QQ A.2 is "How could there be such a large gap between
>> successive consumer reads?".
>>
>> ----
>> @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ seq    & \multicolumn{1}{c}{time (seconds)} & delta~  &  a &  b &  c \\
>>         consumer reads?
>>         See \path{timelocked.c} for full code.
>>  }\QuickQuizAnswer{
>> -       Here are possible scenarios:
>> +       Here are a few of the errors:
>>  
>>         \begin{enumerate}
>>         \item   The consumer might be preempted for long time periods.
>> ----
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I changed this to "Here are a few reasons for such gaps:".  Does
> that work for you?

Works for me!

        Thanks, Akira

> 
> 						Thanx, Paul
> 
>>         Thanks, Akira
[...]



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux