Thank Paul for your encouragement, and thanks for adjusting the commit log ;-)
Thanx, Zhouyi
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 9:34 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:58:30PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > In QQ A.5, the pronoun "that" should be preposition "than". And the
> > word "imptementations" should be "implementations".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Good eyes, queued and pushed, thank you! (It is QQ A.3 over here,
> so I adjusted the commit log.)
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > ---
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I fixes some typo in QQ A.5
> >
> > Thanks Zhouyi
> > --
> > appendix/questions/ordering.tex | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/appendix/questions/ordering.tex b/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> > index 298600f9..05217bc8 100644
> > --- a/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> > +++ b/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> > @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ than the semantics given by the options above.
> >
> > \QuickQuiz{
> > But if fully ordered implementations cannot offer stronger
> > - guarantees that the better performing and more scalable weakly
> > - ordered imptementations, why bother with full ordering?
> > + guarantees than the better performing and more scalable weakly
> > + ordered implementations, why bother with full ordering?
> > }\QuickQuizAnswer{
> > Because strongly ordered implementations are sometimes
> > able to provide greater consistency among sets of calls to
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
