Re: [PATCH-perfbook] ordering: fix typo in QQ A.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 02:58:30PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> In QQ A.5, the pronoun "that" should be preposition "than". And the
> word "imptementations" should be "implementations".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>

Good eyes, queued and pushed, thank you!  (It is QQ A.3 over here,
so I adjusted the commit log.)

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I fixes some typo in QQ A.5
> 
> Thanks Zhouyi
> --
>  appendix/questions/ordering.tex | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/appendix/questions/ordering.tex b/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> index 298600f9..05217bc8 100644
> --- a/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> +++ b/appendix/questions/ordering.tex
> @@ -97,8 +97,8 @@ than the semantics given by the options above.
>  
>  \QuickQuiz{
>  	But if fully ordered implementations cannot offer stronger
> -	guarantees that the better performing and more scalable weakly
> -	ordered imptementations, why bother with full ordering?
> +	guarantees than the better performing and more scalable weakly
> +	ordered implementations, why bother with full ordering?
>  }\QuickQuizAnswer{
>  	Because strongly ordered implementations are sometimes
>  	able to provide greater consistency among sets of calls to
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux