Thank Paul for reviewing and wordsmithing the fix for me. As usually, I read the new version many times，and my English proficiency obtained enhancement ;-) Thanks again Zhouyi On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 12:46 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:16:47PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Hi Paul, > > > > When I examine the answer to QQ 10.15, I can't find the word "roughly" > > around, so I guess it should be "rough" instead ;-) > > > > Thanks > > Zhouyi > > Right you are, and thank you! I have queued and pushed your patch with > the usual wordsmithing, so please take a look below. > > Thanx, Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > commit 6adb3af174ee4ccacd2d6e83025a06bf50f9aee0 > Author: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue Aug 24 17:16:47 2021 +0800 > > datastruct: Fix a typo in QQ 10.15: s/roughly/rough/ > > There is no prior "roughly" for alert readers to have noted, so this > commit changes to that "roughly" to "rough", of which there are prior > instances. > > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > diff --git a/datastruct/datastruct.tex b/datastruct/datastruct.tex > index c3700332..552bd955 100644 > --- a/datastruct/datastruct.tex > +++ b/datastruct/datastruct.tex > @@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@ bottleneck. > the bottleneck and the larger number of buckets increases this > workload's memory footprint. > > - The alert reader will have noted the word ``roughly'' above > + The alert reader will have noted the word ``rough'' above > and might be interested in a more detailed analysis. > Such readers are invited to run similar benchmarks, using > whatever performance counters or hardware-analysis tools
