On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 05:16:47PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Paul,
>
> When I examine the answer to QQ 10.15, I can't find the word "roughly"
> around, so I guess it should be "rough" instead ;-)
>
> Thanks
> Zhouyi
Right you are, and thank you! I have queued and pushed your patch with
the usual wordsmithing, so please take a look below.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
commit 6adb3af174ee4ccacd2d6e83025a06bf50f9aee0
Author: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue Aug 24 17:16:47 2021 +0800
datastruct: Fix a typo in QQ 10.15: s/roughly/rough/
There is no prior "roughly" for alert readers to have noted, so this
commit changes to that "roughly" to "rough", of which there are prior
instances.
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/datastruct/datastruct.tex b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
index c3700332..552bd955 100644
--- a/datastruct/datastruct.tex
+++ b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
@@ -1696,7 +1696,7 @@ bottleneck.
the bottleneck and the larger number of buckets increases this
workload's memory footprint.
- The alert reader will have noted the word ``roughly'' above
+ The alert reader will have noted the word ``rough'' above
and might be interested in a more detailed analysis.
Such readers are invited to run similar benchmarks, using
whatever performance counters or hardware-analysis tools
