Re: [PATCH-perfbook] Fix a little grammar mistake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you Paul and thank you Akira

On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 1:29 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 07:54:30PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > Hello Zhouyi,
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:51:58 +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> > > Hi Paul,
> > >
> > > I think there is a little grammer mistake in answer to quick quiz 10.8,
> > > I am not so sure because my English is not so well ;-)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Zhouyi
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  datastruct/datastruct.tex | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/datastruct/datastruct.tex b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > > index adb102d..68341f2 100644
> > > --- a/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > > +++ b/datastruct/datastruct.tex
> > > @@ -963,1 +963,1 @@ not recommended for production use.
> > >     In theory, it isn't any safer, and a useful exercise would be
> > >     to run these programs on larger systems.
> > >     In practice, there are a lot more systems with more than 28~CPUs
> > > -   than there are systems with more than 448 CPUs.
> >
> > This can be parsed as follows:
> >
> >     In practice, there are a lot more X than there are Y.
> >
> > , where
> >
> >     X: systems with more than 28~CPUs
> >     Y: systems with more than 448 CPUs
> >
> > So there is no grammatical error here.
> > Three uses of "than" in a sentence might be confusing, though.
> >
> > Paul might have an idea of a less-confusing sentence.
>
> Three "than"s in one sentence is a bit excessive, now that you guys
> mention it.
>
> How about this?
>
>         In practice, there are a lot more 28-CPU systems than there are
>         448-CPU systems.
The modified version reads very smoothly for me ;-)
>
> I do not believe that the "more than"s are really adding much here.
I also think so, because when I read "28-CPU system", I immediately
imagine a bundle of systems
that have some CPUs around 28, for example 24-CPU systems, 32-CPU systems ;-)
>
> Thoughts?
>
>                                                         Thanx, Paul
>
> >         Thanks, Akira
> >
> > > +   are systems with more than 448 CPUs.
> > >     In addition, other testing has shown that RCU read-side primitives
> > >     offer consistent performance and scalability up to at least 1024 CPUs.
> > >  }\QuickQuizEnd
> > >
Cheers
Zhouyi



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux