Re: [PATCH -perfbook] Fix the description of rcu_gp_ongoing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:15:54PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I am going to revise Chinese Edition of Appendix with
> Yang Lu's unreserved help.
> 
> During the process of reading, I examined the definition of
> rcu_gp_ongoing in CodeSamples/defer/rcu_nest.h
> Would it better to describe rcu_gp_ongoing in the book as:
> 'it checks the set of bits indicated by RCU_GP_CTR_NEST_MASK.' because
> I think 'it checks the bit indicated by RCU_GP_CTR_BOTTOM_BIT'
> is a little confusing.

Good eyes, thank you very much!

I just made "bit" be plural, so it now reads "the bits indicated by
RCU_GP_CTR_NEST_MASK".  Queued and pushed, and again, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> Thanks alot
> Zhouyi Zhou
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  appendix/toyrcu/toyrcu.tex | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/appendix/toyrcu/toyrcu.tex b/appendix/toyrcu/toyrcu.tex
> index 8fd2aef0..830e4478 100644
> --- a/appendix/toyrcu/toyrcu.tex
> +++ b/appendix/toyrcu/toyrcu.tex
> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ adds \co{RCU_GP_CTR_BOTTOM_BIT} to the global \co{rcu_gp_ctr}
>  instead of adding the constant ``2'',
>  and the second is that the comparison on \clnref{ongoing}
>  has been abstracted out to a separate function,
> -where it checks the bit indicated by \co{RCU_GP_CTR_BOTTOM_BIT}
> +where it checks the set of bits indicated by \co{RCU_GP_CTR_NEST_MASK}
>  instead of unconditionally checking the low-order bit.
>  \end{fcvref}
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux